The FAQs: Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in Case on Free Speech and Bans on Sexual Reorientation Therapy
The ruling in ‘Chiles v. Salazar’ will reshape how states may treat speech in clinical, pastoral, or religiously informed counseling.
The ruling in ‘Chiles v. Salazar’ will reshape how states may treat speech in clinical, pastoral, or religiously informed counseling.
‘Cross Purposes’ comes so close to correctly diagnosing the problem with our ailing late-modern democracy and understanding the fracturing of American evangelicalism. In the end, it merely reinforces a blind faith in classical liberalism.
Every American Christian owes something to the small group of men in Zurich in 1525 who advocated, however unpopularly, that a church should be subject to God’s Word and not to the councils of men.
It’s dangerous to confuse a preferred policy approach with the moral law itself. As we seek to live faithfully in these confused times, ’The Crisis of Civil Law’ can help Christians do so with grace toward other believers.
The Italian Supreme Court’s harassment of an evangelical church serves as a stark reminder that the ongoing threats to religious liberty often come from those who identify as Christians.