The Secular Creed: Engaging Five Contemporary ClaimsWritten by Rebecca McLaughlin Reviewed By Cyndi Logsdon
In The Secular Creed, Rebecca McLaughlin outlines five contemporary claims that form a statement of belief for many of our secular neighbors. Since God has called us to live among neighbors and friends, with diverse backgrounds and beliefs, and we are called to love them and point them to the saving knowledge of Jesus, these are claims with which the Christian community must interact. This book helps us dive deeper into some of the critical issues society is facing and shows how contemporary controversies point us back to our need for the rock-solid foundation of the love, mercy, dignity, and justice taught in our sacred text that was written two thousand years ago.
McLaughlin boldly engages sensitive topics that we are taught to avoid at family gatherings. She frames her chapters around five claims that have begun to appear on yard signs in cities across America: “Black Lives Matter,” “Love is Love,” “The Gay-Rights Movement Is the New Civil Rights Movement,” “Women’s Rights Are Human Rights,” and “Transgender Women Are Women.”
With intellectual precision and genuine humility, McLaughlin models how to engage opposing viewpoints with grace and truth. She begins by asking the reader to consider how Christians should relate to the statement “Black Lives Matter” (p. 6), reminding us that throughout God’s Word—from the opening of Genesis to John’s concluding Revelation—we see God’s “multiethnic heartbeat” (p. 13). She encourages us to carefully disentangle the difference between “Black Lives Matter” as an organization that stands for some things we cannot embrace and the biblical truth that Black lives do indeed matter to Jesus.
Following the BLM discussion, McLaughlin addresses the pervasive contention that “love is love.” This slogan reinforces the view that anyone’s definition of love is valid. Rather than merely offering a differing perspective, she paints a completely different picture and offers an alternative question. Instead of the subjective “what is love?” McLaughlin says we should ask “who is love?” The answer: God alone. She then shows how our search for belonging is right and good. In fact, we were made for a union that is deeper and more beautiful than what we will find in either same-sex or heterosexual marriage. “Christian marriage, at its best, is a beautiful picture of Jesus’ love for us. But it’s not the only one” (p. 41). McLaughlin reminds us that it is in communion with Christ and in communion with his church where we receive the provision we were made for and that we long for.
Progressing through the credal statements etched on yard signs, McLaughlin’s third chapter rejects the argument that to be on the “right side of history,”—as with the civil-rights movement—we must support the gay-rights movement. She contends that sexual orientation is not like race and therefore this claim in invalid (p. 54). She also boldly argues that it was the “historic failure of white Christians to love their Black neighbors” that propelled this powerful claim (p. 43). She gives multiple examples of how the secular perspective does not align with either historical or biblical truth. Without the existence of a Creator God, equality, dignity, and intrinsic worth would not exist. “The problem with Christians who supported segregation was not that they listened to the Bible too much, but too little” (p. 47).
McLaughlin next addresses the pro-choice claim that “women’s rights are human rights” and, according to many in society, the belief that Christianity is bad for both. She gives clear examples of how the Bible, the Church, and Jesus himself value and honor women. Yet, she does not concede that the rights of women supersede the rights of other persons also made in the image of God. If Christianity is true, and if people are indeed made in the image of the living God, then both mother and baby matter (p. 82).
Finally, McLaughlin responds to the idea that “transgender women are women.” As in previous chapters, she points out contradictions in the messages that society heralds. She challenges the reader to know God’s word and proposes that many of the ideas society uses to counter Christianity were actually rooted in God’s word and in God’s good plan from the beginning. She gives examples of current issues that need to be addressed and models honest communication with those who are asking challenging questions by evaluating their claims against the objective truth of Scripture. McLaughlin does this while offering the encouragement and hope that is found in Christ alone.
Since there is no way to address extremely sensitive topics without offending readers on both sides, it is inevitable that McLaughlin’s work will be met with a variety of receptions. Despite the potential that some will take issue with McLaughlin’s conclusions, this book is immensely helpful to the church. Although it addresses only five specific claims, the value for the Christian community is much broader. For instance, McLaughlin provides an example for how to sincerely interact with the issues society is facing in a way that holds Scripture as our ultimate authority. We also learn from McLaughlin how to approach a sensitive issue with a helpful balance of grace and truth, a skill that can be applied to a variety of situations or issues. Maybe most importantly, McLaughlin responds to heated contemporary claims with the humble, intellectual honesty that might win a hearing by someone who needs Jesus.
McLean Bible Church
Vienna, Virginia, USA
Other Articles in this Issue
In the book of Kings, Elisha is the Spirit-empowered man of God who walks with God, represents God, and shows the way to covenant faithfulness through word and deed...
Baptists provide an excellent window into the American identity during the antebellum period...
This article explores Colossians, a letter in which Paul says a considerable amount about work...
This article offers a reading of Nicholas Wolterstorff’s objections to the doctrine of divine simplicity, which has seen a kind of rebirth amongst both Catholic and Protestant theologians in recent decades...
The Targums were not translations for the Aramaic-speaking masses who were ignorant of Hebrew...