All Articles
This essay is the second of a two-part analysis of John’s use of the articular substantival participle...
Empathy and Its Counterfeits: Navigating The Sin of Empathy and a Way Forward
by Jonathan D. WorthingtonIn our families, churches, or neighborhoods; in political discussions, situations of accused abuse, or racially charged conversations; in polarizing times, compassion must be wed with relational exegesis, the well-established name for which is empathy...
Philosophical Foundations of a Transgender Worldview: Nominalism, Utilitarianism, and Pragmatism
by Anthony V. CostelloEvery social and political phenomenon has some prior, underlying philosophical basis...
This article explores the relationship between Tolkien’s angelology, as reflected in his fictional writings, and classical angelology, particularly as represented by Augustine and Thomas Aquinas...
The Role of the Regula Fidei in the Twenty-First-Century Religious Landscape: How the “Rule of Faith” Can Help Address the Existential Issues of the Postmodern Christian Community
by Roland WeisbrotThis article offers a historical-systematic analysis of the role of the rule of faith in establishing and maintaining the Christian metanarrative and orthodox scriptural interpretation...
This article examines the Roman Catholic doctrine of the church as “sacrament of salvation” first formally introduced in Vatican II’s Lumen Gentium (1964)...
The past quarter-century’s upsurge of interest in Calvinism has shown a strong tendency to under-value movements from the first half of the twentieth century...
Contextualizing the Controversial Instructions in 1 Timothy 2:11–15: A Response to Sandra L. Glahn, Nobody’s Mother
by G. K. BealeThis article critically engages Sandra L. Glahn’s book, Nobody’s Mother, which attempts to offer further evidence from the ancient Greek world that supports the arguments that Paul’s instructions in 1 Timothy 2:11–15 are temporary restrictions and statements addressed only to a very specific occasion in first-century Ephesus...
Was David Overreacting? Analyzing 1 Samuel 25 in Light of the Ancient Hospitality Code
by Jared GarciaWas Nabal’s refusal to give food for six hundred people such a terrible wrong that David in 1 Samuel 25 would have been justified in seeking vengeance by killing Nabal’s entire household? Did David simply overreact? This paper demonstrates that an acquaintance with the hospitality code of the Ancient Near East aids in the understanding of the events in 1 Samuel 25...
Does the American Revision of the Westminster Confession Contradict the Original Version on the Doctrine of the Civil Magistrate?
by Kevin DeYoungThis essay reflects on how Presbyterians changed their views on the civil magistrate in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries...