Monthly Archives: August 2010
I need the church in order to be prepared for the Day of Judgment!
It is frightening to think that I would allow myself to be the sole judge of my spiritual condition here on earth. I know how easily I deceive myself. Am I so bold as to say I am the best judge of my spiritual character? No… I need the church to affirm my faith in Christ, to assure me when I doubt, and to lovingly rebuke me when I err. Judgment day is coming!
Have you ever noticed that older people tend be more faithful to church than young people? This isn’t true everywhere, of course. But even in multi-generational churches, it’s often the older people who are the most faithful.
There may be a variety of reasons for this fact, but I think one reason is clear: people who are older know that the Day of the Lord is drawing near. Either Jesus will soon come back, or they will soon go see Jesus. And the closer you get to the end of your life, the more likely a Christian is going to realize the seriousness of walking with Christ.
Why is that so many people showed up at church after September 11?
Why is the youth group room filled whenever a young person is killed in a car crash?
Because, for a moment, we are shaken out of our slumber. The brevity of life hits …
CCM was once needed as young Jesus freaks set out to change the world — one that would not offer them record contracts. The result was a parallel universe that has outlived its reason for being. In the end, the future of CCM is linked to the future of two monoliths: the music industry and evangelicalism. What we see developing are nascent models of artistic expression (inspired by faith) that may very well be classified by style and not worldview.
Fred Sanders interacts with my “steak on a paper plate” article in a cleverly titled post, “Hey Everybody, Let’s Sursum a Little Corda, Kay?”
As a free church evangelical in suburban southern California, I participate in the general trend of casual service-openers. I think it’s a great, culturally appropriate way to start out a gathering…
But here’s the key: At some point in the service, and it has to be a pretty early point, one of the ministers presiding over the worship service needs to get our attention and let us know that we’re doing a very serious thing.
Original Greek statues were brightly painted, but after thousands of years, those paints have worn away. Find out how shining a light on the statues can be all that’s required to see them as they were thousands of years ago.
Today, while listening to an excellent rendition of “Turn Your Eyes …
This is one of my favorite sections from one of my favorite books on writing, Words Fail Me: What Everyone Who Writes Should Know about Writing.
I love how the author breaks many of the pseudo-rules in this section.
If grammar is supposed to help us make sense, why do some of the rules seem so nonsensical? Well, maybe those aren’t real rules, after all.
You’ve not doubt heard them all your life:
Don’t split an infinitive.
Don’t start a sentence with and or but.
Don’t end one with a preposition (of, to, with, and so on).
Don’t use contractions (including don’t).
None of them are true – including the one that says none is always singular.
These misconceptions, which serve only to make writing clunky and convoluted, are not real rules and never have been. Since the 1300’s, writers of English have gotten along fine without them. So where did they come from?
In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, classics scholars set out to civilize the English of Chaucer, Shakespeare, and Milton. They took a language that’s essentially Germanic and tried to clothe it in Latin grammar. No wonder the shoes pinched.
For generations, our most eminent grammarians have tried to lay these myths and Latinisms to rest, but they keep rising again like Jason from his watery grave. And like Jason, they’re not real, so feel free to ignore them. Our best writers do. George Bernard Shaw once complained to the Times of London about an editor who hadn’t gotten the …
Andreas Köstenberger Joins B&H Academic Editorial Team:
Dr. Daniel L. Akin, president of Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, adds, “Andreas Köstenberger is one of evangelicalism’s finest New Testament scholars and a gift to our seminary. We are delighted to share this gifted academician with co-laborers in the gospel. This is a good thing for the work of the kingdom and the building up of the Church of the Lord Jesus Christ.”
Terry Delaney live-blogged and posted his notes from the SBTS conference Connecting Church and Home.
My friend, Owen Strachan, is pulling the plug on his always-insightful blog:
Individually-run blogs do great things. However, I do want to guard against pride in my own heart and against being a “personality.” You can have an individual blog and not fall prey here; you can have an individual blog and not be a self-promoter. But I can also see how I myself can be tempted in these areas. Franky Schaeffer-no theological role model of mine-has some strong words on the nature of self-promoting evangelical culture that have resonated with me.
Amazing! Giant beach bubbles. (I bet these make you wet.)
We rejoice, heavenly Father,
in the truth that Jesus rose from the dead.
Yet we see that this is not simply a truth in the public arena of history
to be absorbed quickly and then set to one side.
For if indeed your dear Son, the God-man, rose from the dead,
then everything is changed.
His victory over death is confirmed.
The sacrifice he provided has been vindicated.
Already he is the head of a new humanity that will one day share in his resurrection-likeness.
And his people, heavenly Father,
rejoice to bow before him and cry, “My Lord and my God.”
Grant that each of us may cry,
“Forgive my sin as you forgave the sin of that paralyzed man,
my Lord and my God.”
In Jesus’ name, Amen.
- adapted from D.A. Carson’s The God Who Is There: Finding Your Place in God’s Story
I have thoroughly enjoyed Julie Rose’s new translation of Victor Hugo’s Les Miserables. I read the more common English translation a few years ago and enjoyed it (the story is a classic, after all), but Rose’s translation is like going from a black-and-white television to color.
As I read through Hugo’s novel this summer, I underlined thought-provoking sayings and comments. Over the next several Saturdays, I’d like to share some of them here.
“The free time left to [Bishop Bienvenu] by these thousand matters and by his church services and his breviary was given first to the needy, the sick, and the downtrodden; the time left to him by the downtrodden, the sick and the needy was given to toil. Sometimes he took a shovel to the garden, sometimes he did a bit of reading and writing. He had one word only for these two different kinds of work: he called both gardening. ‘The mind is a garden,’ he would say.” (17)
“…The beautiful is just as useful as the useful.” After a pause, he added, “Perhaps more so.” (21)
“Do not ask the name of the person who asks you for a bed for the night. He whose name is a burden to him needs shelter more than anyone.” (22)
“There is such a thing as priestly courage just as there is the courage of the colonel of the dragoons. Only,” the bishop would add, “ours should be quiet.” (22)
The best minds have their soft spots and sometimes feel somewhat bruised by …
Seven links for your weekend reading:
1. Mark Galli: How to become a successful religion
2. Greg Koukl: Abortion and human rights
6. Tullian Tchividjian posts Tim Keller’s foreword to Unfashionable.
Notes on two books I’ve read recently:
You Can Change:
God’s Transforming Power for Our Sinful Behavior and Negative Emotions
My Rating: ****
In this book, Tim Chester leads readers to think about what they want to change and then examine their underlying motivations for such a change. Encouraging us to turn from certain desires to certain truths, he grounds lasting change in daily repentance as a response to the gospel of grace. Best of all, he incorporates individual change into the context of the church and insists that sanctification is a community project. Each chapter ends with a list of hard-hitting questions that lead us to practical application of biblical truth.
Surprised by Grace:
God’s Relentless Pursuit of Rebels
C.S. Lewis was surprised by joy. N.T. Wright is surprised by hope. Pastor Tullian Tchividjian is surprised by grace, particularly the grace he finds in the Old Testament story of Jonah. Although the Bible condenses Jonah’s story into four brief chapters, Tchividjian digs deep into the text and emerges with a book full of gospel treasure. Contrasting Jonah’s tribal mindset with the missionary heart of God, Surprised by Grace places individual salvation and calling into a cosmic context of redemption that emphasizes the need for Christians to be overwhelmed daily by God’s grace toward rebels. Tchividjian’s book combines insightful exegesis, pastoral wisdom, and personal passion. (Art admirers will also enjoy the illustrations: fourteen famous artist renderings of Jonah throughout church history.)
(These reviews first appeared in Christianity …
Sometimes the most conservative people are the most biblically and scholastically sound. They have studied Scripture and have studied skeptical scholarship. They make brilliant arguments for the way something in the Bible reads and how it’s been interpreted. I don’t go to them necessarily to know more about their personal beliefs. It’s the brilliance they bring to bear on the text that appeals to me. Of all the people I’ve read over the years, it’s their work that I keep on my desk. They’re all non-Catholics, but they’re believers, they document their books well, they write well, they’re scrupulously honest as scholars, and they don’t have a bias. Many of the skeptical non-believer biblical scholars have a terrible bias. To them, Jesus didn’t rise from the dead, so there’s no point in discussing it. I want someone to approach the text and tell me what it says, how the language worked.
In a nutshell, every classroom at SEBTS should be a Great Commission classroom because every page of Scripture and every locus of doctrine relates in some way to the charge given to us above. Christian Theology is the most exciting thing that a person could possibly study, and one of the exciting things about it is that it not only drives us to ministry and mission, …
Yesterday, I posted a reflection on worship called “Steak on a Paper Plate” which questioned whether or not a casual, informal approach to worship will be able to sustain substantive expository preaching over the long run.
Today, a friend and fellow blogger, Zach Nielsen (Take Your Vitamin Z) responds to yesterday’s post. Zach is one of the pastors at The Vine in Madison, Wisconsin and has much experience leading music in church. I like what Zach has to say about the character of the worship leader and I’m glad he has agreed to stop by the blog and offer this response.
Being formal or not is more a function of the person who is leading and less about the structure that he imposes upon himself for leading the worship service. You can make a “contemporary” service feel very formal and you can make a strict PCA liturgy feel very informal. It depends on who is leading.
I grew up in a church that followed a very strict ELCA Lutheran liturgy, but the senior pastor had a way of making it feel personal and not simply a robotic recitation of words. On the flip side, I have been to services that are “contemporary” and “informal” that felt very stiff and awkward because those leading did not have the skill set to lead in a way that felt relaxed and more free.
So my question for those leading church …