Monthly Archives: January 2011
1. Existing fetal homicide laws make a man guilty of manslaughter if he kills the baby in a mother’s womb (except in the case of abortion).
2. Fetal surgery is performed on babies in the womb to save them while another child the same age is being legally destroyed.
3. Babies can sometimes survive on their own at 23 or 24 weeks, but abortion is legal beyond this limit.
4. Living on its own is not the criterion of human personhood, as we know from the use of respirators and dialysis.
5. Size is irrelevant to human personhood, as we know from the difference between a one-week-old and a six-year-old.
6. Developed reasoning powers are not the criterion of personhood, as we know from the capacities of three-month-old babies.
7. Infants in the womb are human beings scientifically by virtue of their genetic make up.
8. Ultrasound has given a stunning window on the womb that shows the unborn at eight weeks sucking his thumb, recoiling from pricking, responding to sound. All the organs are present, the brain is functioning, the heart is pumping, the liver is making blood cells, the kidneys are cleaning fluids, and there is a fingerprint. Virtually all abortions happen later than this date.
9. Justice dictates that when two legitimate rights conflict, the limitation of rights that does the least harm is the most just. Bearing a child for adoption does less harm than killing him.
10. Justice dictates that when either of two people must be inconvenienced or hurt to …
Brandon Smith recently hosted a virtual roundtable discussion with Steve McCoy, Trevin Wax, and myself on topics related to the church and social media.
A snippet from one of Steve’s responses:
we can’t just stand back and listen to the hum of a million tweets with short shelf life. We have to focus in on thousands of relationships, and down to one relationship between two twitterers, and see what’s happening right now between them that’s going to last.
Read the whole thing.
What makes pornography so powerful? How is it such a perfect storm of sinful appeal? I believe it is because it combines the trifecta of worldly lusters, what John calls “all that is in the world.”
1 John 2:16: For all that is in the world — the desires of the flesh and the desires of the eyes and pride in possessions — is not from the Father but is from the world.
This is the same three-part temptation that Eve found so undeniable (in Genesis 3:6).
The Desires of the Flesh“So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food . . .”
The Desires of the Eyes“and that it was a delight to the eyes . . .”Pride in Possessions“and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate . . .”
Pornography contains original temptation’s nucleic acid.
The Desires of the FleshIs this not obvious from the sexual lust it arouses and claims to satisfy?
The Desires of the EyesPornography sinks its hooks into the heart through visual appeal.
Pride in PossessionsThe spiritual retardation pornography wreaks is complex. Because it exalts self-gratification, use of it is an act of pride. Because it requires more and more of it to gratify, like any drug promising a high, it encourages accumulation. One picture or video scene is enough at the beginning. The further one goes into pornography, the more pictures and scenes he or she needs to reach gratification. And there is a “secret knowledge” …
Final version of the cover for my next book Gospel Wakefulness (Oct. 31, Crossway) released yesterday. The train track thing is a play off an illustration in the first chapter, and the whole vibe of the cover kind of reminds me of the (hardback) covers for Paul Auster’s Book of Illusions or Travels in the Scriptorium. Which is a good thing.
Evangelicalism suffers under the leadership of those who treat ministry like a technology and church like a business.
The Church does not need brilliant personalities but faithful servants of Jesus and the brethren . . . Pastoral authority can be attained only by the servant of Jesus who seeks no power of his own, who himself is a brother among brothers to the authority of the Word.
– Dietrich Bonhoeffer
I discovered the spending a day reading thrity pages of Karl Barth’s Dogmatics helped me more in my pastoral work than a hundred of pages of how-to literature.
In my church history reading I ran into a biography of a pastor, The Life of Alexander Whyte; a personal narrative of a pastor, The Letters of Samuel Rutherford; and a fictional account of a pastor, Father Zossima in Feodor Dostyevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov . . .
These books helped me a lot. But I didn’t know why stories about pastors who lived centuries ago could help me so much. I thought I was supposed to be a modern pastor, relevant to the world around me; and these books were from different worlds. But as I read these stories I felt myself caught up in the protagonists’ struggles to follow Jesus Christ in their daily lives.
These narratives pointed me to the fact that pastoral ministry is a life, not a technology. How-to books treat pastoral ministry like a technology. That’s fine on one level — pastoral ministry does require certain skills, and I need all the advice …
Someone once wrote Roger Ebert and asked him why critics loved Sofia Coppola’s film Lost in Translation so much while audiences in general didn’t even appreciate it. Ebert responded that the film transmitted on a different frequency than audiences are accustomed to receiving. (I was reminded of this tidbit from Ebert’s “Movie Answer Man” column only a couple days later while overhearing a conversation in a restaurant in which two men discussing of the movie revealed no hints of even knowing what it was about.)
It works the same way with books, I think, particularly as it relates to the dulling of the evangelical artistic palate. Is it too much to say that Christian readers have a distinct taste for mediocrity? I know evangelicals take a lot of hits for poor artistic sensibilities, but maybe the critique is a cliche for a reason?
Is it a supply problem or a demand problem? I think it’s both, which means the Christian publishing industry (and Christian retail in general, really) is in a vicious cycle of sorts. Publishers print what sells and until readers start buying substantive literature, publishers won’t produce it. But if publishers aren’t producing it in the first place, then readers don’t even have the opportunity to buy it. So basically, Christian readers are consuming what’s available because they don’t perceive any other option (in the Christian bookstore, that is).
The unfortunate side effect of that, though, is that we are producing generations of Christians whose literary appetites are for junk food.
Galatians 4:1-7:I mean that the heir, as long as he is a child, is no different from a slave, though he is the owner of everything, but he is under guardians and managers until the date set by his father. In the same way we also, when we were children, were enslaved to the elementary principles of the world. But when the fullness of time had come . . .
What a wonderful phrase! “When the fullness of time had come.” It is the gospel counterpart to the biblical lament “How long O Lord?”
That there is a fullness of time reminds us that “The Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise as some count slowness” (2 Peter 3:9).
I am reminded of Gandalf’s words to Frodo in The Fellowship of the Ring: “A wizard is never late, nor is he early; he arrives precisely when he means to.”
For still the vision awaits its appointed time; it hastens to the end—it will not lie.If it seems slow, wait for it; it will surely come; it will not delay.
– Habakkuk 2:3
There’s a date set! It will not delay.
Are you waiting for deliverance from something? Are you longing for the Lord’s return?
God’s timing is perfect. He’s never late nor is he early. He arrives precisely when he means to.
I figure the raison d’etre of both discernablogger-type fundamentalists and quasi-pomo, pseudo-liberal rethink-everything Christians is really the same thing: complaining about the other. My friend Bill calls this syndrome I Have Identified the Problem, and It Is You.
Remember, brothers — all of you, conservative or liberal, young or old, MacArthur fan or Miller fan — a prophet speaks from the inside. Let us not shrink back from calling each other to repentance, to speaking the truth in love, but let’s remember we speak prophetically to us, not them.
And let us not shrink back from our brother’s reproof if it is offered in sincerity. He may be wrong, he may be overzealous, but his energy merits consideration.
It is not “stoning” to biblically criticize another, as one blogger said of another’s efforts recently. What a silly charge that makes the receiver appear an oversensitive child and belittles the gravity of, you know, actually being killed by having rocks thrown on you. If a blog post critical of you is akin to stoning in your eyes, you need help with perspective.
Judgment of one’s speech and actions is not condemnation. Test all things; cling to what is good. If the criticism is truly malicious or just wrong: dismiss it. But not before then. And certainly not with some self-glorifying notion that one is above the reproof of fellow Christians. Don’t think strangers have the right to criticize you? Then don’t post thoughts in public for strangers to read. It is no Christian …
One of my oldest, closest friends lived a double life until he was broken under the weight of his sin. He reflects on the difference the gospel made in a piece called On Fireworks and Hope. An excerpt:
I had no fear of the truth, though; by God’s grace I had no fear. When I lived my double life (years prior) I guarded everything in my life with intensity. I didn’t want anyone to rummage through my wallet, my cell phone calls, my text messages, my vehicle, my computer records, or my bank transactions, and I made darn sure that those items were kept safe from prying eyes. Since January 2008 — that blessed month of severe mercy — I couldn’t care less if someone wanted to go through my records with a fine-tooth comb, and in the case of the authorities in my life, I wish they would be so thorough. How true I found these proverbial words to be: “The wicked flee when no one pursues, but the righteous are bold as a lion” (Proverbs 28:1).
A good bit of Eric’s story appears in my forthcoming book Gospel Wakefulness.
Perfect love drives out fear, friends. When one is hidden in Christ, he has nothing left to hide.
From Charles Spurgeon’s autobiography (Vol. 1):
It was arranged that I should use the Surrey Gardens pulpit, so, a day or two before preaching at the Palace, I went to decide where it should be fixed; and, in order to test the acoustic properties of the building, cried in a loud voice, “Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.” In one of the galleries, a workman, who knew nothing of what was being done, heard the words, and they came like a message from Heaven to his soul. He was smitten with conviction on account of sin, put down his tools, went home, and there, after a season of spiritual struggling, found peace and life by beholding the Lamb of God. Years after, he told this story to one who visited him on his death-bed.
Is the gospel power or what?